ext_158923 (
ophblekuwufu.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
pastwatcher
2012-10-01 10:33 am (UTC)
no subject
Indeed.
Though I would hope they would read this law as an injunction not to shackle
anyone
giving birth. The "women" stipulation sounds like an ill-considered careless addition to me, which (I would hope) they would waive in cases where it doesn't apply.
(
2 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
no subject
Though I would hope they would read this law as an injunction not to shackle anyone giving birth. The "women" stipulation sounds like an ill-considered careless addition to me, which (I would hope) they would waive in cases where it doesn't apply.